
Joint Employment is an employment arrangement where two or more employers share control and responsibility over the same worker. While it enables flexible workforce models, it also creates significant legal and compliance risks if misunderstood. For HR leaders and executives, joint employment is not just an HR concept, it's a governance issue that directly impacts liability, payroll, and labor law compliance.
Joint Employment occurs when an employee is considered to be employed by more than one employer at the same time, based on how work is controlled and managed. Even if only one company issues paychecks, another company may still be legally responsible if it exercises sufficient control over the employee's work.
In the U.S., regulators such as the U.S. Department of Labor evaluate joint employment under laws like the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The goal is to prevent businesses from avoiding labor obligations by shifting responsibility to third parties.
For HR teams, the risk lies in assuming 'not on our payroll' equals 'not our responsibility.' In joint employment, that assumption is often wrong.
Joint employment is more common than many organizations realize, especially in modern workforce models.
When a staffing agency hires workers but the client company controls schedules, tasks, and supervision, both entities may be joint employers. The agency handles payroll, while the client directs daily work creating shared liability.
Franchisors that dictate hiring practices, wage policies, or operational controls may be deemed joint employers with franchisees, even if they don't directly employ workers.
If a company outsources functions like IT support or customer service but still controls performance metrics, work hours, or discipline, joint employment risk increases.
In platform models, excessive control over pricing, work methods, or availability can blur the line between independent contractors and joint employees.
Pro Tip: The more control your organization exercises over workers even indirectly the higher the joint employment risk.
There is no single test, but regulators and courts evaluate economic reality and control.
No single factor is decisive. Instead, the total relationship is assessed.
From an HR governance standpoint, documentation, contracts, and actual day-to-day practices must align. Paper agreements alone do not override operational reality.
These terms are often confused but are not identical.
| Aspect | Joint Employment | Co-Employment |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Legal determination | Contractual arrangement |
| Typical Use | Staffing, franchises | PEO models |
| Liability | Shared by law | Shared by agreement |
| Risk Level | High if unmanaged | More predictable |
In co-employment, responsibilities are clearly divided through a Professional Employer Organization (PEO). In joint employment, liability is imposed by law often unexpectedly.
If joint employment is established, both employers can be held liable for:
This shared liability can result in lawsuits, penalties, and retroactive payments.
HR teams must clarify:
Misalignment leads to compliance gaps.
Employees don't differentiate between 'primary' and 'secondary' employers. Poor treatment by one party can damage the brand of the other.
Contracts should clearly define responsibilities, but HR must ensure daily practices reflect those boundaries.
Avoid directly managing schedules, discipline, or compensation for non-payroll workers unless contractually required.
Line managers often create risk unknowingly by treating contractors or agency workers like direct employees.
Regularly review vendor arrangements, staffing models, and role definitions to identify hidden joint employment exposure.
Accurate records of work hours, supervision boundaries, and employment status support compliance and audits.
Joint employment is sometimes unavoidable especially in:
In such cases, the goal is not avoidance but risk-managed compliance through transparency, documentation, and coordination between employers.

Managing shared workforces without clear visibility is risky. Qandle's HRMS helps centralize workforce data, attendance tracking
FAQ's
1. Is joint employment illegal?
No. It is legal, but it creates shared legal responsibilities.
2. Does joint employment require a written agreement?
No. It is determined by actual control and working conditions, not just contracts.
3. Can both employers be sued by an employee?
Yes. Either or both joint employers can be held liable.
4. Is joint employment the same as outsourcing?
Not always. Outsourcing can still result in joint employment if control is shared.
5. How can HR identify joint employment risk early?
By auditing control, supervision, and dependency across non-payroll workers.
6. Does joint employment apply outside the U.S.?
Yes. Many countries have similar doctrines under different legal frameworks.
Get started by yourself, for free
A 14-days free trial to source & engage with your first candidate today.
Book a free Trial